Fertilizer Facts: May 1996, Number 8
Nitrogen Fertilizer Materials
Jeff
Jacobsen and Scott Lorbeer
Dept. of Land Resources and Environmental Sciences
Montana State University
Several different N materials are available (Figure 1). They differ
in chemical composition, but perform equally well if applied at the same rate using
appropriate application practices. These materials are found in granular, liquid, and
gaseous forms and require different application equipment. In order to use these sources
most effectively, their unique characteristics and the unique management guidelines that
govern their use must be understood.
|
| Figure 1. Use of N fertilizers in Montana from1989 to 1994. (Data from 1995 Montana Agricultural Statistics.) |
Ammonium nitrate (AN)
Urea (UR)
Anhydrous ammonia (AA)
Nitrogen solutions and suspensions (NSOL)
Choosing a nitrogen source
Your selection depends on:
The most important decision to make is what N application rate to use. By basing it on sound agronomic criteria and soil analysis, optimal growth rates occur, fertilizer dollars are used most economically and the environment is protected from excessive fertilizers in surface and ground water. The general recommendation for N and K2O (potash) combined when placed with the seed is no more than 30 lbs actual/a. This amount will vary up or down depending upon soil water status, texture and the type of application equipment.
In Figures 2-5, "% of check yield" is used as a measure of plant response to fertilizer, where the fertilized treatment yield divided by check yield (no fertilizer) multiplied by 100 gives the vertical axis value.

In Figure 2**, urea (UR), ammonium nitrate (AN), nitrogen solution (NSOL), and anhydrous
ammonia (AA) were applied to spring wheat. N sources had comparable performance at the
same N rate. Each point on the graph represents four plots. A 10% increase in yield equals
4.2 bushels/acre.
In Figures 3-5, little fertilizer response is seen due mainly to drought conditions. However, the negative effect of banding UR, and to a lesser extent AN, with seed is evident, with a decrease in yield with an increase in N rate.
In Figure 3, winter wheat was grown at four locations utilizing UR or AN in three different placements. Each point represents either 16 plots (UR, AN) or 32 plots (AVGs). UR and AN banded with seed reduced yields. UR had a greater negative effect than AN at the same N rate.

In Figure 4, spring wheat was grown with UR and AN with three placement methods. Each
point represents either 12 plots (UR, AN) or 24 plots (topdress). UR and AN banded with
seed reduced yields. UR reduced spring wheat yields more than AN.

In Figure 5, two locations of spring wheat and four locations of winter wheat were
fertilized with UR with three placement methods. No real differences in yield were
observed for topdress or deep band N. With each incremental increase in urea-N rate, yield
decreased. Each point represents 24 plots.

**Figure 2 uses data from H. Houlton (1978) "The yield and
protein results of fertilizing spring wheat with anhydrous ammonia, ammonium nitrate, urea
and liquid 32-0-0". Data for Figures 3-5 are from J. Jacobsen (1988)
"Summary of maximizing efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer used for dryland cereal
grain production in conservation tillage systems in Montana".